Text models
Arena rating
THE MODEL, IN DETAIL / Anthropic
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6ProprietaryReasoningOpus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...
Arena rating
128K max output tokens
USD / million input tokens
USD / million output tokens
6 provider routes observed
No model-level measurement
01 / PERFORMANCE
Read the score, understand the context, and explore where this model sits among its peers.
Individual published accuracy scores · not a composite index
At least three published accuracy scores are needed for this view.
Text models · same published source and version
Text models · Arena · official dataset
Rank #9 in this published cohort. 416 models in the source cohort. Showing selected nearby models. Evaluation settings can differ.
Coverage is not a capability score.
Documented features, task evaluations, and preference rankings describe different things. Missing coverage does not imply a model cannot perform a task.
Explore our methodologyPublished rankings for this exact model or configuration. Each source keeps its original metric.
02 / BENCHMARK EXPLORER
Original results, exact versions, and a direct path to the evidence behind every score.
Percentage-based evaluations will appear here when published.
0 percentage-based evaluations. Each benchmark measures a different task; compare results within the same evaluation and protocol.
Published in the OpenRouter catalog · source-defined index values
Catalog observation: 16 Oct 2026. Index versions and evaluation settings are not supplied in this feed. These are not Singularity composite scores.
Artificial AnalysisSource-reported Elo across individual design categories
Catalog observation: 16 Oct 2026. Category ratings have separate comparison pools.
03 / COST & VALUE
Explore token prices, see where the spend goes, and model a workload of your own.
| Billing field | Published rate | Billing basis |
|---|---|---|
| Web Search | $0.01 | Source-supplied USD rate; see provider billing terms |
| Input Cache Write | $6.25 | USD / million tokens |
| Input Cache Write 1h | $10 | USD / million tokens |
Change the numbers. See the trade-offs.
Token estimate only. Excludes cache writes, tools, and other provider fees. Actual token usage and provider limits vary.
1,000 requests · 11M tokens
04 / INFERENCE NETWORK
Compare inference routes by price, context, quantization, and reported availability.
| Provider / route | Input / M | Output / M | Cache / M | Context | Output limit | Speed | Latency | Availability · 1d | Rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CClaude Platform on AWSQuantization not disclosed | $5 | $25 | $0.5 | 1M | 128K | — | — | 100% | |
| AAzureQuantization not disclosed | $5 | $25 | $0.5 | 1M | 128K | — | — | — | |
| GGoogleQuantization not disclosed | $5 | $25 | $0.5 | 1M | 128K | — | — | 100% | |
| AAmazon BedrockQuantization not disclosed | $5 | $25 | $0.5 | 1M | 128K | — | — | 100% | |
| AAnthropicQuantization not disclosed | $5 | $25 | $0.5 | 1M | 128K | — | — | 100% | |
| GGoogleQuantization not disclosed | $5.5 | $27.5 | $0.55 | 1M | 128K | — | — | 100% |
Snapshot observed 16 Oct 2026. Speed and latency are the reported 30-minute median when available. This is a dated snapshot, not live monitoring.
USD per million tokens · input and output rates
Provider availability over the selected observation window
Reported 30-minute p50 · tokens per second
No provider throughput measurements were returned in this snapshot.
Reported 30-minute p50 · seconds
No provider latency measurements were returned in this snapshot.
Actual route limits can differ from the catalog maximum
05 / CAPABILITIES & MODALITIES
A map of documented interfaces and API features, separate from benchmark performance.
INPUT MODALITIES
OUTPUT MODALITIES
Listed catalog API parameters and documented pricing features
Context capacity and completion limits
Output tokens share the total context budget. The maximum completion length is a separate limit, and individual provider routes may have smaller limits.
Check the provider before depending on a specific API feature.
| Provider route | Reasoning | Tools | Structured output | Response format | Implicit caching |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Platform on AWS | Supported | Supported | Supported | Supported | Not listed |
| Azure | Supported | Supported | Supported | Supported | Not listed |
| Supported | Supported | Supported | Supported | Not listed | |
| Amazon Bedrock | Supported | Supported | Supported | Supported | Not listed |
| Anthropic | Supported | Supported | Supported | Supported | Not listed |
| Supported | Supported | Supported | Supported | Not listed |
06 / UNDER THE HOOD
Exact identities, model architecture, limits, and the defaults that shape a request.
Claude Opus 4.6anthropic/claude-4.6-opus-20260205Availability is catalog-wide. Defaults can vary across providers.
include_reasoningSupported · default not suppliedmax_completion_tokensSupported · default not suppliedmax_tokensSupported · default not suppliedreasoningSupported · default not suppliedreasoning_effortSupported · default not suppliedresponse_formatSupported · default not suppliedstopSupported · default not suppliedstructured_outputsSupported · default not suppliedtemperatureSupported · default not suppliedtool_choiceSupported · default not suppliedtoolsSupported · default not suppliedtop_kSupported · default not suppliedtop_pSupported · default not suppliedverbositySupported · default not supplied07 / BUILD WITH THIS MODEL
Use the documented catalog identifier and keep your API key in an environment variable.
const response = await fetch(
"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions",
{
method: "POST",
headers: {
Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.OPENROUTER_API_KEY}`,
"Content-Type": "application/json",
},
body: JSON.stringify({
"model": "anthropic/claude-opus-4.6",
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Explain the trade-offs in this design."
}
]
}),
},
);
if (!response.ok) throw new Error(`HTTP ${response.status}`);
const data = await response.json();
console.log(data.choices[0].message.content);08 / PROVENANCE & HISTORY
Follow the source, check the observation date, and distinguish published results from model specifications.
Direct links to the underlying records
Architecture, modalities, parameters, and starting prices
Observed 16 Oct 2026Provider limits, prices, availability, and reported measurements
Observed 16 Oct 2026Arena rating · source-reported ranking
Observed 15 Oct 2026Recorded events, in chronological order
Catalog creation date, as recorded by OpenRouter.
Catalog pricing, limits, and supported parameters captured.
6 inference routes in this snapshot.
Observation dates describe when data was captured. They do not represent newly run evaluations or continuous performance monitoring.
Historical evidence, with source and version preserved.
No published benchmark observations for this selection. Published preference rankings appear separately above.
09 / A FEW MORE DETAILS
Quick answers, drawn from this model’s connected specifications.
Catalog starting rates are $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens. Cache-read pricing is $0.5 per million tokens. Compare provider routes and service tiers above for their specific prices.
1,000,000 tokens in the catalog context window. The catalog lists a maximum of 128,000 completion tokens. Provider limits can differ.
Tool calling: listed as supported. Structured outputs: listed as supported. See the provider feature matrix for route-specific differences.
Read the benchmark name, exact version, metric, source, and model configuration together. Different evaluation settings can change the result. Preference ratings and source-defined composite indices remain separate from task accuracy.
This page uses dated source snapshots. Catalog data was observed on 16 Oct 2026. Provider routes were observed on 16 Oct 2026. Missing measurements are not estimated or treated as zero.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore related identities from the same developer, or take them into a side-by-side comparison.